Did you mean villains with no morals, motives, and just, boringly evil?I think the same, by heart I can say my favourite, recent villains would be Light Yagami from Death Note, Lelouch from Code Geass and Thanos.I don't know how much chapters you read, but there will be many kind of villains: "complex" or "quick" in varying degrees with respect to the situation.Cain would be a pretty good example of one more on the complex side.Basically, as I wrote in the review I want to write all kinds of personalities...If I got you curious the chapters are waiting for you😄👋

For now, I'm taking it as a daily hobby... so no. Thanks anyway for asking! Hope you're enjoying the story!

May I help you? :) I suppose the sentence was quite long and not immediate to understand...(?)

I'll improve to make it so for me too... Thanks a lot for the review!

I'm relly happy you're enjoying it so far!

Even if quite short, thanks for the honest review. As it was the first one not coming from a review swap, it feels special to me. I hope you're enjoying reading the story. Have a great day!

Thanks a lot for the correction! I hope you'll enjoy the rest of the story!

Thank you for you donation! The fact that you were the first gives it even more value to me. I hope you will continue to enjoy reading the story going on. Have a great day!

The review is based on the first impression I had of the novel, evaluating the book cover, synopsis, and the first chapter. In the complex an enjoyable read, due to the high writing quality. The book cover is eye-catching and the synopsis is pertinent to the story. The main negative detail I feel is worth saying is the division of the universe presented not quite clearly in the first chapter. The events' narration doesn't seem fast, normal, or quite slow depending on personal taste, if compared to the synopsis. The update frequency seems high and constant. Finally, the reader is advised to who's into sci-fi and reincarnation. Keep it up, author!👍

First of all, thank you for the feedback. English is not my first language so I'm sure my grammar isn't perfect. For proofreading, I'm mainly relying on Grammarly. In the synopsis, I tried mainly to arouse the curiosity of the possible reader. If you have already read the first chapter and find the way it's written unclear, I would ask you to go into more actionable details. Even though I'll try to improve the how I find interesting seeing any possible natural improvement in my writing style in the next future. I hope you'll be there when that happens! Have a great day👋

The review is based on my first impression about the novel(synopsis, prologue and ch.1). Honestly the kind of m.c. (auto-destructive and possibly crazy) isn't my type but I'll try to be as objective as possible. The writing quality and richness in terminology are definitely high. The update frequency does not seem consistent, but if the author manages to keep this rhythm he's way over the 1 daily upload standard. The story development is quite slow(from the chapters we know only about his violent relationship with his father, addictive substances, start of relationship with Sarah, and possibly the beginning of some mental problem), but I personally still enjoyed the psychological rambling because of the before mentioned writing quality. For the pace I also used the synopsis as comparison and the story seems still quite unclear from what I read. The character design for the m.c. is really good but consequentially that of Sarah and his father are lacking, but this should be solved in the future. Finally the world background doesn't seem that original or specific, but from the end of the first chapter it seems to be thought mainly as the point of view that the m.c. has of it. Don't like this kind of bad ending(feel-bad stories) but I feel those who like the genre will surely find an interesting read in this novel. Keep it up, author👌

Usually, I write my reviews basing myself on synopsis and the first chapter. In this case I read the second one too, because from the first one it could seem a normal slice of life without any fantasy element and the first chapter felt quite short. It being my first impression, I could edit it in the future. The writing quality seems to be over the average:I could catch some grammar errors but did not ruin substantially the fluency of the read. The psychological and external descriptions of the characters seems detailed. Hopefully in the future the update frequency will become daily. Finally, the world background seems a good mix between isekai and various mythologies. In the complex, the read is recommended to the fans of the genre. Keep it up author👍

* then that woman... I hope to be helpful.

Review of my first impression of the novel, based on the synopsis and the first chapter so it's probably that I will edit it in the future. Very good writing quality:rich in the dictionary but maybe with too long sentences. Hopefully, with time, the update frequency will increase. The story seems quite slow-paced and focused on describing mainly the psychological side of the story. For the same psychological description, the quality of the character design of the old madam seems of high quality. As for the world background we had just a hint of fantasy in the end of the 1st chapter leaving the reader with many questions. Finally, I recommend the read to the fans of the historical-fantasy genre. Keep it up author👍

This is a review based on my first impression based primarily on the synopsis and the first chapter, so I'll probably edit it in the future. Very good writing quality but the story development, compared to the synopsis seems quite slow. The updating stability will hopefully improve in the future. Finally, the character design and world background don't seem, particularly original or cliché. In the complex, the read is strongly recommended to those who like the awakeners genre. Keep it up author👍

I'd say my main goal for the novel is to write the most interesting and various personalities possible. I want any relevant character to be unique in a way, so I'd wish the reader to enjoy the psychological side of the story first and foremost. If you find errors or have advice, comment about them and I'll probably edit it right in 1-day max or try to implement the idea. I hope you'll enjoy the story.

The review is based on a first impression of the novel so I'll probably edit it in the future. The writing style is definitely original. The grammar errors can be solved with Grammarly, quite useful to have a fluent read. The story's pace seems to be just right for my taste. The author breaks frequently the fourth wall exchanging humor for immersion. I do not think it is definitely a bad thing, but I think it is a characteristic that can easily split the viewer'opinion. In the complex the read is recommended to who enjoys the comedic writing style

The reading experience is really fluent and nice The originality of the idea and the psychological description of the m.c. attracted me the most. I hope the author wiil keep it up.

Thanks a lot for the review and the compliments. I hope you'll enjoy the ride, reading in the future too! If you remember the specific ratings, what do you think I can improve? It'd help me a lot if you had time to answer. Anyway, have a great day!

Thanks a lot for the honest review! Many times I leave voluntarily many things with not many details because I find it more interesting, from the reader's point of view to know things gradually than have massive info-dumps. Finally, I give the main focus to the rhythm of the story so, for example, if I wrote in detail about the training in the forest I think it would have gotten too slow-paced. I plan on filling these holes in the future, don't worry. I hope you'll still be reading the novel at that time! If you remember the specific ratings, what do you think I can improve? It'd help me a lot if you had time to answer. Anyway, have a great day!