Levoniko
My mind often wanders. And I also mostly have nothing much to say. So why did I choose writing if I often run out of words even if my life depends on them? Beats me.
Writing
of reading
33
Read books
The attention to detail made the scene come alive especially the last line.
This vignette of a first chapter introduced concisely the MC and her status quo. I like the use of irony in the family name Best. The writing is good though it could use a tiny bit of refining. I'd suggest to drop the use of the words 'was' 'were' as in 'was laughing' or 'was 'studying' and the like. Try using active verbs instead: 'he laughed' and 'he studied'. Though there will be exceptions, of course. I'm happy with the POV. Try looking into the technique called 'free indirect discourse/style. It can help you add more attitude to the narration. Overall, it's a good start. Keep writing.
I'm not really into the 'inside the game' genre, but this story is charming. Thanks to the MC and the setting and how the author presented them to the reader. The writing needs a improvement though. And I did some in-line comments regarding that. But I'm sure, with practice and study of techniques, the author will be able to craft more compelling stories. Good luck!
Other filters here: glanced, saw, noticed. Try removing those and see how your narration tightens.
Try using fewer filters like "I saw". Instead, you can write it as, 'His lips curled, snickering..." Especially for a story in first person, the narration should read as if the events are happening in front of the perspective character and the reader.
The word 'me' pulled me out of the story since I thought the novel was going to be written in third person. I suggest establishing the POV at the very first sentence, even in the prologue. This can be achieved by describing the scene from the perspective character's eyes. Try making the details have a personal meaning to the narrator (who is the character as well).
Verb tense needs to be consistent all throughout the novel.
Channeling Jack Sparrow. It's good.
What I liked: The author thought out the history and origin of the central conflict. The characterization is also there. What needs improvement: the author can use the good old "show don't tell" writing advice. I also suggest the use of editing and proofreading softwares like Grammarly. In general, the story has potential, even in a saturated genre, it can deliver something fresh.