so looking at the current reviews for this it reminds me I totally told off the author in a chap comments section... did he actually take that seriously? or is this still the same vapid fan group that thinks edgy means mature and thoughtful

I totally forgot to rate this last time I read it. it was just that bad. the author perpetually stagnates and reverts character development. the grammar isn't terrible, but grammarly and word both exist so anything less than like 98% correct is very bad. the world background building was ok not the greatest the occasional exposition gets kinda irritating after a bit. also short chaps to keep that top spot.

n

or

p

go to a **** site jeez

it sounds like the concept was nice. however the reason people say it's bad by just looking at one or two chaps is cuz the author is just bad at writing. you can really tell how good an author is when you read the first chapter(not prologue). reason being that its the most important one that you SHOULD be taking the most care with. legit makes 3 or four common noob writer mistakes in the first half of the dang thing. exposition dump and self contradiction(mind you in the same chapter). for a bit I though some stuff was just cuz of a language barrier thing buuut all the grammar is correct.

that's pretty much what he said tho it's just 'how' that actually matters. what they described was good world building what ur giving is the actual definition. because info dumps obviously point out that the author is just bad or lazy and looking for easy money