Nambi01
Always hungry
of reading
163
Read books
the human kind.
as an elite soldier, he could now remember the last five minutes ! much wow when he'll become a super elite, he'll finaly be able to spell his name!
s#ite this mobile interface is infuriating
it must be my illiteracy that made me miss you agreeing. And made you think i even suggested correcting issues from a long time ago. I will reread the thread to see if i did
Ah you're absolutly right, I'm crazy as F. Then a bit of homework for you since you seemed to love history lessons: .Representing a totally fictionnal Napoléon was never the issue. But you can check for yourself if the author was alluding to a fictionnal one (discounting its descendant). . Second : Is there really no present repercussion coming from the actions of an historical figure ? Check the story of the Haitian debt to France slavers... You seems to mix 'be history' with 'being historical'. It's weirdly useful to your argument. As in it smuggles in the idea that nothing from the past can influence the present... Outside this nice little talk of ours, people call the kind of reasonning that presuppose the ending 'circular reasonning'. You can also look it up.
just read the synopsis. nothing about a travel agency . and supposedly the MC is named Chen Yang and not chu ze...
Insults are inexact disperaging assertions. Mine were accurate and only descriptives. But that isn't an issue because it's in the past.
Huge sigh. It seems your intellect followed you in your 'down to earth' attitude to the ground... Presents problems are the results of past issues. And others are just past problems still unresolved. As for who has right to do what in geopolitics, it's almost completly irrelevent.
'centuries old' As if the facts that peoples don't have equals rights exists to this day... You're either overly simplifyng or blind.
And again, just because you saying it doesn't hurt anyone doesn't mean it's true just because it's something you can't grasp. Plus, it can still do some harm in the futur. History negationism actually is one of the tools of those admiring Napoléon that actually got into power position and weren't that kind for the rest of the world
Well then, it seems you have absolutly no grasp of a nation memory's stakes and it's cascading effects. Who do we chose to remember and honor and why.
didn't do the 'murica conversion but yeah it's a friging hangar
Still didn't take prisonners among the conscipts. Calling him 'butcher'on this
Well, when hé actually f*cked over your ancestor, destroyed what was left of the first republic, mowed lives all over Europe, including french ones. And reinstated slavery while ordering literral massacres in colonies. And said fcktard still view him as nothing more than an exemple. So making a point to admiring individuals by showing that he wasn't much more than your usual tyrant may look like personnal enmity to aforementioned admiring individuals. Then again, people admiring tyrants tends to follow autoritative personnality too. Forgetting that under their rules they may change their opinion. And forgetting those who where systematicaly fcked.
megalomania can easily be cured with a single massive lead intake to the head
i feel he's ignoring half of his population as potential workforce.
BS.
Oof if it's not a crime, it' not grossly immoral. Nor a sign of psychopathy.
while assuring us he's not a psycho.