Review Detail of Sylex in TENSURA: That Time I Abandoned Humanity
Review detail
I have not read it so I will just give it 3 starts not bad nor good, what turned me off was the genderbend like I don't understand why do many authors like to have weirdos as Mc's? I personally only read male Mc but I would rather females then se freak jumping between genders, choose a gender and stick with it 🤷
TENSURA: That Time I Abandoned Humanity
Door_kun
Liked by 3 people
LIKEReplies19
what makes it Interesting? being a freak? I'm going to judge your taste and say you sir need to be put in a pit of snakes and get watched by people dying slowly. no offense of course
Imagetsomehelp:And that's what makes it interesting. Also, MC technically was not genderbended in this story though?
Dude... do that in moderation. Here's an example: (Judging you silently) Though, the genderbend on the start is just a "clue" to ensure "the world background is an AU" to the audiences. There's never a shipping with MC here. As for the genderbend in Volume 5, it's just me forcing the story to move forward. Volume 5 was not played by the MC, but rather, his alternate.
Sylex:what makes it Interesting? being a freak? I'm going to judge your taste and say you sir need to be put in a pit of snakes and get watched by people dying slowly. no offense of course
I said I didn't read this novel?? you had the tag genderbend which is most of the time means the Mc is the one who is a freak jumping between genders?is he or is he not? idc if the other original characters become females so they can be shipped I would like that. is the Mc a freak or not?
Door_kun:Dude... do that in moderation. Here's an example: (Judging you silently) Though, the genderbend on the start is just a "clue" to ensure "the world background is an AU" to the audiences. There's never a shipping with MC here. As for the genderbend in Volume 5, it's just me forcing the story to move forward. Volume 5 was not played by the MC, but rather, his alternate.
Well if you "didn't read" you shouldn't be able to make a review in the first place. If only reading the synopsis makes everyone thinks they're in a position to "Review" then... Well, That's review abuse. And no, Mc is not genderbended. the other characters is.
Sylex:I said I didn't read this novel?? you had the tag genderbend which is most of the time means the Mc is the one who is a freak jumping between genders?is he or is he not? idc if the other original characters become females so they can be shipped I would like that. is the Mc a freak or not?
Door_kun:Well if you "didn't read" you shouldn't be able to make a review in the first place. If only reading the synopsis makes everyone thinks they're in a position to "Review" then... Well, That's review abuse. And no, Mc is not genderbended. the other characters is.
Well for starter, It doesn't make sense for you to vote lower or even 1 star at writing style, world background, plots, update stability and character design if you only read the "synopsis". "Synopsis" are meant to be intriguing whilst being vague as possible. You can't always trust a synopsis better than a synopsis full of narration that goes; Follow [Mc's name] through his journey bla³ and so on. But that's still not the whole story or even a chapter 1. What you were doing is simply the same concept as "judging a book by its cover" or in this case, "judging a book by its synopsis" And don't even bother using the excuse of "Warning" the new readers. It's not worth it, you'll just making the community worse.
Sylex:how is it abuse? it not my fault you won't the synopsis this way? and I didn't give a bad rate.
you do understand that a cover is very important to a book. it is what attracts you th the book before reading it, and so it the synopsis. as for why I rated those stuff I just did to get the rate to 3 to not be based
Door_kun:Well for starter, It doesn't make sense for you to vote lower or even 1 star at writing style, world background, plots, update stability and character design if you only read the "synopsis". "Synopsis" are meant to be intriguing whilst being vague as possible. You can't always trust a synopsis better than a synopsis full of narration that goes; Follow [Mc's name] through his journey bla³ and so on. But that's still not the whole story or even a chapter 1. What you were doing is simply the same concept as "judging a book by its cover" or in this case, "judging a book by its synopsis" And don't even bother using the excuse of "Warning" the new readers. It's not worth it, you'll just making the community worse.
Door_kun:Well for starter, It doesn't make sense for you to vote lower or even 1 star at writing style, world background, plots, update stability and character design if you only read the "synopsis". "Synopsis" are meant to be intriguing whilst being vague as possible. You can't always trust a synopsis better than a synopsis full of narration that goes; Follow [Mc's name] through his journey bla³ and so on. But that's still not the whole story or even a chapter 1. What you were doing is simply the same concept as "judging a book by its cover" or in this case, "judging a book by its synopsis" And don't even bother using the excuse of "Warning" the new readers. It's not worth it, you'll just making the community worse.
Some people tend to do that, apparently. They'll leave a 1-star review to "warn" new readers to not read the story because they hate that one part of the story, or something. I dunno. They just don't care about what they're reviewing. To them, there's no Writing Quality, Updating Stability, Story Development, Character Design, world background.
Sylex:why would I bother warning others?
I will give it a try now that the Mc is no freak but I do suggest fixing the mis understanding the genderbend you could just say AU or smh because it is very mis leading. as for the 3 stars Idk how else to talk here without the rating and I wanted to be neutral as you said
Door_kun:Dude... do that in moderation. Here's an example: (Judging you silently) Though, the genderbend on the start is just a "clue" to ensure "the world background is an AU" to the audiences. There's never a shipping with MC here. As for the genderbend in Volume 5, it's just me forcing the story to move forward. Volume 5 was not played by the MC, but rather, his alternate.
Door_kun:Some people tend to do that, apparently. They'll leave a 1-star review to "warn" new readers to not read the story because they hate that one part of the story, or something. I dunno. They just don't care about what they're reviewing. To them, there's no Writing Quality, Updating Stability, Story Development, Character Design, world background.
Haha well...yeah, that. You know uhh...anime misunderstandings? yeah, wanted to try to make that. but well, it end up being at least 20+ chapters to established that whole thing... PS: MC is not a freak, but he is dumb. I bestow him with schizoprenia and ADHD (well technically his ADHD evolved into schizoprenia but) because of that very mental disease, he is often misunderstood by those around him. His LUC stat is also the reason for this.
Sylex:I will give it a try now that the Mc is no freak but I do suggest fixing the mis understanding the genderbend you could just say AU or smh because it is very mis leading. as for the 3 stars Idk how else to talk here without the rating and I wanted to be neutral as you said
PPS: About staying neutral, Why not comment? just comment on the author of the recent chapter author had uploaded. You have no idea how much authors appreciate that. Well, most of the time.
Sylex:I will give it a try now that the Mc is no freak but I do suggest fixing the mis understanding the genderbend you could just say AU or smh because it is very mis leading. as for the 3 stars Idk how else to talk here without the rating and I wanted to be neutral as you said
when I said freak I meant the whole genderbend thing as for commenting on the latest chaps I don't I can do that if I haven't read the first chaps and I was commenting about the gender bend
Door_kun:PPS: About staying neutral, Why not comment? just comment on the author of the recent chapter author had uploaded. You have no idea how much authors appreciate that. Well, most of the time.
Door_kun:PPS: About staying neutral, Why not comment? just comment on the author of the recent chapter author had uploaded. You have no idea how much authors appreciate that. Well, most of the time.
Sylex:are you not the author? the way you said it here sounds like you are a translator or smh
...let me get this... Is this about you getting confused is it the MC getting genderbend or the side character or... what? Or maybe you just don't like it when the gender-bend is not AU or something? I don't think I'm following right now. But it may be this; "You don't like it when MC is switching genders too much?" Don't you think your explanation is a bit... vague? Anyway, no MC won't be switching genders as in the end, he becomes genderless. No sm*t or s*x in this story. Volume 5 is a different case, well if you actually read until part.
Sylex:when I said freak I meant the whole genderbend thing as for commenting on the latest chaps I don't I can do that if I haven't read the first chaps and I was commenting about the gender bend