webnovel

Review Detail of FunnyBuns in A JOURNEY OF THE FATED CONQUEROR PART 1: MORTAL REALM

Review detail

FunnyBuns
FunnyBunsLv153yrFunnyBuns

Honestly, I can't read it. Self-insert and wish fulfillment is good if done right, unfortunately, this isn't one of those cases. The main character's original name is the author's username, and while that isn't going too far what is going to far is that you can tell the author put his real name into the main character's reincarnated self's new name. This type of self-insert wish-fulfillment is something that is made for the author instead of the readers. A series made for the readers would have the reincarnation's name would either be a Chinese name which is what is considered normal on this site, it could have been a generic western name which could be the name of countless individuals of any race or origin, and finally it could have been a random name you might call yourself as a kid like Snake Manly or some ****. Even on the off chance the reincarnation's name isn't the author's real name it should have some significance to him, which still makes it applicable only to him.

A JOURNEY OF THE FATED CONQUEROR PART 1: MORTAL REALM

souryourer

Liked by 1 people

LIKE

Replies10

souryourer
souryourerAuthorsouryourer

Well it still isn't my real name may be partial hehe or may be interested name hehe Thanks for the reply

souryourer
souryourerAuthorsouryourer

Thanks for the review

Nikhil_Chand
Nikhil_ChandLv4Nikhil_Chand

Well I think the review is biased. Even if author chooses his name to be his character's name what is wrong with that? A name is a name.... Also there was a time when Chinese Japanese Korean names were new. Heck even now Korean names are difficult to remember. That doesn't mean the stories aren't good. Everything has its first time and so does the naming convention author is using.... Also you didn't talk much about story. So I feel it's a little unfair to author and fellow readers....

FunnyBuns
FunnyBunsLv15FunnyBuns

I swear man, instead of complaining about valid criticism you should have just written your own review. Honestly the fact that it took you until after I made a review, and the fact your review was a response to valid criticism proves you are the one with a bias. Maybe if you truly read the review you'd realize why I criticized the naming and that I'm doing what is in the best interest of the readers and the author, while your complaints about my review are in the best interest of the author. Finally, you talk as if not saying much about the story is an issue. It is really laughable that you would actually claim I'm being unfair to the reader and authors by doing that.

Nikhil_Chand:Well I think the review is biased. Even if author chooses his name to be his character's name what is wrong with that? A name is a name.... Also there was a time when Chinese Japanese Korean names were new. Heck even now Korean names are difficult to remember. That doesn't mean the stories aren't good. Everything has its first time and so does the naming convention author is using.... Also you didn't talk much about story. So I feel it's a little unfair to author and fellow readers....
Nikhil_Chand
Nikhil_ChandLv4Nikhil_Chand

I didn't claim anything. Just as you gave your opinion, I gave mine. What I meant was: naming of the story is just one aspect. And why is it important to have chinese or western names in a story and not of any other country? I agree that people are not accustomed to Indian names but that doesn't mean author should follow chinese or western naming convention to make his novel successful. I mean then people will never use any other naming conventions. There can always be a disruption,no? Initially even chinese and korean names were a bit difficult for english readers to grasp. I still find it difficult to grasp korean names. The point you think valid others may not think so...... I find it agreeable that some readers may give up novel coz of the difficult naming but if you read a good story and you like it then why not? I mean at some point we adjusted to chinese japanese and korean names right? Also I am human. Maybe I am completely wrong about everything I said. Maybe coz I put forward my point of view I was biased towards the story as I liked it. I always review after i feel author will not drop chapters just by writing only 20 chapters or so. Also yes, your review reminded me that I should put a review for this novel. My review was not an opposition to your review in any way. If you read it I just summarized 50+ chapters that author has written. Ah and the last point about writing about story in reviews. That was my personal opinion. Sorry if it bothered you but when I look for reviews I see for those reviews which tells me about story, writing quality, world background, characters so I get an idea about what the story is. You atleast wrote something about story and reading it a reader can form a judgement about story. But most reviews are about emojis or exp or they just write the story is good or bad. How can a reader understand anything from such reviews?

FunnyBuns:I swear man, instead of complaining about valid criticism you should have just written your own review. Honestly the fact that it took you until after I made a review, and the fact your review was a response to valid criticism proves you are the one with a bias. Maybe if you truly read the review you'd realize why I criticized the naming and that I'm doing what is in the best interest of the readers and the author, while your complaints about my review are in the best interest of the author. Finally, you talk as if not saying much about the story is an issue. It is really laughable that you would actually claim I'm being unfair to the reader and authors by doing that.
FunnyBuns
FunnyBunsLv15FunnyBuns

That is the point I'm getting at, even if it isn't your name it somehow relates to you, on top of the original name being your username. It is two different things when a novel is written for the author to self-insert and when it is written for everyone to self-insert. If it is written for the author to do so than the novel is written for the author, if it is written for everyone to do so the series is written for both the author and readers. What separates a successful and unsuccessful series is whether or not the readers are kept in mind and the way I view it a series that makes it harder for viewers to relate isn't one where the readers are kept in mind. Though I will give you this, in what I did read the MC didn't get a description, and as long as he doesn't get some description like race it does help in my opinion as a name can really be used on someone of any race.

souryourer:Well it still isn't my real name may be partial hehe or may be interested name hehe Thanks for the reply
souryourer
souryourerAuthorsouryourer

Be a little more open minded All the novels are not same When you want to create something you must feel it But not dwell on the names, names are only references Try feeling it not just read it

FunnyBuns:That is the point I'm getting at, even if it isn't your name it somehow relates to you, on top of the original name being your username. It is two different things when a novel is written for the author to self-insert and when it is written for everyone to self-insert. If it is written for the author to do so than the novel is written for the author, if it is written for everyone to do so the series is written for both the author and readers. What separates a successful and unsuccessful series is whether or not the readers are kept in mind and the way I view it a series that makes it harder for viewers to relate isn't one where the readers are kept in mind. Though I will give you this, in what I did read the MC didn't get a description, and as long as he doesn't get some description like race it does help in my opinion as a name can really be used on someone of any race.
souryourer
souryourerAuthorsouryourer

Be a little more open minded All the novels are not same When you want to create something you must feel it But not dwell on the names, names are only references Try feeling it not just read it

FunnyBuns:That is the point I'm getting at, even if it isn't your name it somehow relates to you, on top of the original name being your username. It is two different things when a novel is written for the author to self-insert and when it is written for everyone to self-insert. If it is written for the author to do so than the novel is written for the author, if it is written for everyone to do so the series is written for both the author and readers. What separates a successful and unsuccessful series is whether or not the readers are kept in mind and the way I view it a series that makes it harder for viewers to relate isn't one where the readers are kept in mind. Though I will give you this, in what I did read the MC didn't get a description, and as long as he doesn't get some description like race it does help in my opinion as a name can really be used on someone of any race.
FunnyBuns
FunnyBunsLv15FunnyBuns

I'm going to drop the name point as you really don't seem to get it and that point obviously went over your head. You wrote a review in direct response to mine, you protected a series you like after you felt it was attacked, meaning you are completely biased and that fact won't change. If you had written it at some later date that would be one thing, but your review was a direct response to mine. Even if I reminded you to write one, you could have written it later, you wrote it as soon as you saw mine as an act of protection of something you liked. I don't blame you for protecting something you like as there is nothing wrong with it, but it means that you are the one with a bias if you feel such a strong need to protect the series. Also, blame those bad reviews on webnovel and their decision to give exp from reviews, I hate that as it artificially inflates scores, and it is only made worse when an author can delete a review that contains any criticism. I get there are trolls that abuse the review system, but there are authors who do it too.

Nikhil_Chand:I didn't claim anything. Just as you gave your opinion, I gave mine. What I meant was: naming of the story is just one aspect. And why is it important to have chinese or western names in a story and not of any other country? I agree that people are not accustomed to Indian names but that doesn't mean author should follow chinese or western naming convention to make his novel successful. I mean then people will never use any other naming conventions. There can always be a disruption,no? Initially even chinese and korean names were a bit difficult for english readers to grasp. I still find it difficult to grasp korean names. The point you think valid others may not think so...... I find it agreeable that some readers may give up novel coz of the difficult naming but if you read a good story and you like it then why not? I mean at some point we adjusted to chinese japanese and korean names right? Also I am human. Maybe I am completely wrong about everything I said. Maybe coz I put forward my point of view I was biased towards the story as I liked it. I always review after i feel author will not drop chapters just by writing only 20 chapters or so. Also yes, your review reminded me that I should put a review for this novel. My review was not an opposition to your review in any way. If you read it I just summarized 50+ chapters that author has written. Ah and the last point about writing about story in reviews. That was my personal opinion. Sorry if it bothered you but when I look for reviews I see for those reviews which tells me about story, writing quality, world background, characters so I get an idea about what the story is. You atleast wrote something about story and reading it a reader can form a judgement about story. But most reviews are about emojis or exp or they just write the story is good or bad. How can a reader understand anything from such reviews?
Nikhil_Chand
Nikhil_ChandLv4Nikhil_Chand

Hmmm about the naming thing we might not agree. Also again I would like to say maybe *I WAS BIASED* since I like the story. And maybe subconsciously I wrote the review to protect the story. But if you read the review you will see only a sincere review. I have written all about what the story is, summarized it, pointed out where it seemed like MC was way too OP for his age. My first line says that the start is lame. So yes my review views the story in a favorable part. But my intention was not to strongly protect the story as neither my review can save story nor your review can break the story right? Well you are also right about authors keeping only 5 star reviews and deleting true low rated reviews. They also spam reviews. Same goes with audience as they just want to learn exp. :)

FunnyBuns:I'm going to drop the name point as you really don't seem to get it and that point obviously went over your head. You wrote a review in direct response to mine, you protected a series you like after you felt it was attacked, meaning you are completely biased and that fact won't change. If you had written it at some later date that would be one thing, but your review was a direct response to mine. Even if I reminded you to write one, you could have written it later, you wrote it as soon as you saw mine as an act of protection of something you liked. I don't blame you for protecting something you like as there is nothing wrong with it, but it means that you are the one with a bias if you feel such a strong need to protect the series. Also, blame those bad reviews on webnovel and their decision to give exp from reviews, I hate that as it artificially inflates scores, and it is only made worse when an author can delete a review that contains any criticism. I get there are trolls that abuse the review system, but there are authors who do it too.