The_Pope_Of_Coom
as a wise man once said “STOP PUTTING CHEMICALS IN THE WATER THAT TURN THE FREAKING FROGS GAY”
of reading
1478
Read books
we are talking about kids that aren't in school yet, which you would have known if you actually read what we said, instead of just trying to insert yourself randomly into a conversation you weren't a part of, so uagadou is inapplicable
wow, it's almost like i said "implies" and not "means"
she started talking about what now
for those who clicked on this paragraph wondering why it has so many comments, it's just a stupid argument. the other dude here said they were useless, because they can't intervene directly, i disagreed and then he started arguing about the wrong thing. go ahead and read it if you have time, but that's the gist of it, have fun
I'll take that as gg, then, I'm honestly surprised you backed down
bro?
pal? friend?
hellloooooo? where'd you go buddy?
firstly, wow nice rage, that sure makes you seem like a logical dude who is in the right and totally 17, nice, and secondly, notice how you can't defend against it?
my brother in Christ, at least read my analysis of it before deciding to be an idiot again.
the EXACT statement is "We can't intervene in it directly", which does not change my argument. i dont know why you would think it would, as we've been arguing for almost 50 comments now, explain instead of refusing to do so, cause you ain't getting anywhere or helping yourself by not doing so
and THATS why I'm arguing! because yet again, if you tell someone to kill someone, you still killed that person under the law! indirect is still useful
i fully agree that they can't intervene directly, but I don't agree that they are useless. that's why the argument was initiated, because you said they were useless, not that you said they couldn't intervene directly
AFTER you said they were useless and i said they weren't. the foundation was that you said they were useless and i said they weren't. you can't change the original point of an argument after the fact dude
strange, i got a notification that you replied to me and when I clicked it, it said it has been moderated and deleted
so THATS why you've been so stup!d, not because you're actually stup!d, but because you've been arguing about the entirely wrong thing
no, it isn't, its about whether they are useless or not, which if you actually read the first comments you would know
did you not learn the first time not to curse? you got deleted again
if you don't understand something then ask, if you don't know that, then there is even more proof that you aren't 17
don't tell me youve been arguing this entire time while being too stup!d to understand what iIwas saying?