Logi_cal
Writing
of reading
3276
Read books
Badges
6Moments
186
Logi_cal18dCommentedReally?
"Hm, and who told you that I am a good guy?" I asked her with a raised brow. My smile is yet to fall.- Logi_cal19dCommented
Yes
A stewardess led to him an empty apartment adorned with a king-sized bed, a full bathroom, and a large TV. He laid in that bed for what seemed like hours, each tick of the clock almost painful until he finally drifted off into the land of dreams. - Logi_cal1mthReplied to Fellow_Daoist_JohnCh 34 A Better Tomorrow - 2
- Logi_cal1mthReplied to Yamata_no_Orochi
Learning swordsmanship can indeed be perceived as easier compared to archery due to several factors. Firstly, swordsmanship often involves more tangible physical movements that are easier for beginners to grasp initially. Unlike archery, where precise hand-eye coordination and understanding of arrow trajectory are essential from the outset, swordsmanship allows beginners to engage in basic drills and movements relatively quickly.Additionally, immediate feedback in swordsmanship training can make learning more straightforward. With a sword in hand, practitioners can feel the impact of their strikes and parries, providing instant feedback on their technique. This direct physical feedback can facilitate faster progress and adjustment compared to archery, where hitting a target requires more finesse and consistency.Furthermore, the structured nature of many swordsmanship training programs, such as those found in historical European martial arts (HEMA) or modern fencing, can provide clear milestones and progressions for learners. Beginners can follow a structured curriculum that gradually introduces more advanced techniques and concepts, allowing them to build upon their skills over time in a logical and organized manner.Moreover, the accessibility of swordsmanship equipment and training facilities in some areas may also contribute to its perceived ease of learning. Unlike archery, which often requires specialized equipment and facilities for target practice, basic swordsmanship drills can be performed with minimal equipment and space, making it more accessible to beginners.In conclusion, while both swordsmanship and archery require dedication and practice to master, the tangible physical movements, immediate feedback, structured training programs, and accessibility of equipment and facilities associated with swordsmanship can indeed make it easier for beginners to learn compared to archery.The draw weight of an ordinary medieval war bow is estimated to have been max 80-110 pounds, but the draw weight of few individual surviving bows has been as high as whopping 185 pounds.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal1mthReplied to Yamata_no_Orochi
Bruh, you literally copy pasted chatgpt.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal1mthReplied to Yamata_no_Orochi
And we are talking about war.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal1mthReplied to
Well, it also depends on the type of bow you are trying to learn. You need a minimum strength of 30lbs to pull a bowstring that is capable enough to pierce flesh with cloth only. To pierce chainmail would require bows like longbows, which had a minimum draw weight of 180lbs. So, I would say learning swordsmanship is easier.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal2mthCommented
Wording could have been better.
Gwan Joon finished the push-ups with slight difficulty, tired from the intense training before lining up. He stood still, with his fingers faintly shaking. While he looked controlled outside, no emotions could be seen on his face. His mind, on the other hand, was a mess. - Logi_cal2mthReplied to Msilver
Yeah i don't know where the misconception began about longswords and armors being heavy. The armors usually weighed around 15-25 kg (33-55lbs) and a longswords usually weigh around 1-1.5 kg (2lbs). It breaks my immersion in a fanfic if they say that the armor was heavy or a sword was heavy. They could give the reason for difficulty in moving in armor by saying they were clunky which wasn't the case in real history as mobility was an important thing.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal2mthReplied to Msilver
Alright my bad i thought they were able to pierce plate armor.Searched it up:At the Battle of Crécy, the English longbowmen were positioned strategically on high ground, giving them a tactical advantage. While the longbows might not have directly pierced the plate armor of the French cavalry, they could still inflict casualties and disrupt the enemy formation in several ways:Volume of Fire: English longbowmen were trained to shoot rapidly and accurately. The sheer volume of arrows raining down on the French cavalry would have increased the likelihood of hitting vulnerable spots or causing blunt force trauma, even if individual arrows didn't pierce the armor.Targeting Unprotected Areas: Longbowmen likely aimed for gaps in the armor or less protected areas of the body, such as the face, underarms, or legs. Even with plate armor, there were areas where soldiers were less protected.Impact and Injury: Even if arrows didn't penetrate the armor, they could still injure or incapacitate the horses or their riders. Injured or disrupted cavalry units would become less effective in battle.Psychological Impact: The relentless barrage of arrows would have created fear and confusion among the French cavalry, potentially causing them to break formation or lose morale, leading to further vulnerability.Overall, while the longbows might not have directly pierced the plate armor of the French cavalry, their effectiveness in causing casualties and disrupting enemy formations contributed significantly to the English victory at the Battle of CrécyThough i believe we can both agree a swordsman is superior than a archer.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal2mthReplied to Logi_cal
By they i meant knights.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal2mthReplied to Msilver
"There's bows which can pierce plate armour, and the reason for this is that both bows and armour vary a lot regarding their constructions." I mean sure some arrows may be deflected. But in a battle there are multiple archers not a single one. They will be easily taken down. As knights which acted as mostly cavalry, cannot deflect arrows with a sword. Besides learning swordsmanship is easier as compared to archery.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal2mthReplied to Msilver
bruh, don't spread false info. Go and search battle of crecy on youtube.
An archer can do that though, as long as he was a good archer, was a long distance away and he had arrows. Plus the battlefield was safer in the back than in the front of an army. - Logi_cal6mthCommentedDragons
- Logi_cal6mthReplied to SERBMADHAUSDragons
- Logi_cal7mthCommented
You can. I am also using a huawei nova 7i. Connect your Gmail account with Facebook and connect it through that. It works for me. Keep in mind you need both apks for facebook and webnovel.
AUTHOR'S NOTE: I apologize if I'm not able to respond on paragraphs comment's, I'm not using an app version since my phone is huawei, I couldn't login gmail acc on huawei. I'm using browser. - Logi_cal7mthCommented
Do what you are more comfortable with.
A/N: Quick update, I've decided to make this GOTO DC only. I always seek improvement as I write so for my next experiment, I'm going to try a GOTO where Mc isn't completely op from the start, that book will be the Marvel version, which will come after the IHAPR reboot, yes, that work is coming back too. Let me know if you're fine with this or would still prefer this same GOTO to include Marvel. Enjoy~ - Logi_cal8mthReplied to Luse
Ah, thank you for telling me i thought she was fanon.
An airy but not unintelligent-sounding voice spoke softly, "Hello, Professor Gamer… At the Start-of-Term feast, you said to come to find you if we needed any help at all… Is that true? Can you help me?" - Logi_cal8mthReplied to Semets
She isn't in the books. Fanon made daphne.
An airy but not unintelligent-sounding voice spoke softly, "Hello, Professor Gamer… At the Start-of-Term feast, you said to come to find you if we needed any help at all… Is that true? Can you help me?" - Logi_cal8mthReplied to Semets
Fanon, just like Daphne Greengrass.
An airy but not unintelligent-sounding voice spoke softly, "Hello, Professor Gamer… At the Start-of-Term feast, you said to come to find you if we needed any help at all… Is that true? Can you help me?"