The question is simply wrong, Peter should ask where Arsgard or Odin's Kingdom is.

hehe

This must be correct

Hello author, just here to say that the paragraph is repeated. 👍

👍

Very good, thanks for another chapter

Taking into account the Loki series, the TVA is no longer a threat, as supposedly Loki did what he did before the films Spider-Man: No Way Home and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, Taking into account the Loki series, the TVA is no longer a threat, as supposedly Loki did what he did before the films Spider-Man: No Way Home and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. And so, we can come to the conclusion that the Multiverse is already a thing, instead of having Kang's unique sacred timeline. Or not, it depends on the author haha

Star Craft; Street Fighter; Tekken; Resident Evil (Games / Movies); Transformers; Naruto; Dragon Ball; Avatar: The last Airbender; Godzila / King Kong; Star Wars; One Piece; Final Fantasy; Mortal Kombat; Aliens / Predator; Nier: Automata; Appleseed Ex Machina; Cyberpunk 2077 / Cyberpunk: Edgerunners; Villain Initialization; Blade Runner; D&D; Lord of Rings; Terminator; Arcane (League of Legends); Warhammer 40k; Battle Angel Alita; Invencivel; Matrix Deus Ex Machina;

Nah, he can do it himself

sooner or later technologies like this would reach DC's Earth, all Lex Luthor would have to do is make a little effort. But knowledge of the DC universe is something else

Very Good, But Batman himself doesn't need to kill, he just doesn't need to be against it. Or we can just say he's the movie version hehehe

Can anyone tell me if this is really a good thing? Like, there must be planets out there that would be pure material to build special things, like that Vibranium planet still exists?

In half a billion years this may be possible, but now? Not even wanting

I very much doubt that it would generate wars, especially because if it happened it would be thousands of years in the future when at least half of those planets would be occupied. And even if there were wars it wouldn't be much of a problem, let them kill each other, it would be a way of balancing things out. Another thing, the Infinity Stones are still there, so there's always a way to fix things... And another thing, Galactus himself could help with this balance by eating some of these overpopulation civilizations

It worked in one of thousands... But it didn't even take hundreds of years to actually prove that it worked, it just proved that the planet temporarily stabilized. He's not a liar, but that doesn't mean he's correct

There has been more than one Joker (the last time I saw it was already on the third), which means that even if you kill one, another will appear

And I'll say more, did you forget that in the comics there were at least 3 different Jokers? Since (If I'm not mistaken, 2 of them have already died) with only the current one left? Don't you understand what I'm trying to say? Simple, even if the Joker actually dies, someone else will take his place. That's how DC works, that's how Batman works. He doesn't kill because he CANNOT kill. Not because he doesn't want to kill. If he kills him he breaks and stops being Batman. He becomes something else, but not Batman. Of course, there are other versions of Batman who have no problem killing, but if you use these, then the point of the argument is lost, as he already kills from the beginning, just like in Ben Affleck's films.

Why are you always like this? Batman only arrests them but then they are released again... Are they really going to ignore that this only happens because the screenwriter wants it to? And if it's supposed to be like that, then even killing the villain, the screenwriter would find a way to resurrect him in the next chapter just because. AND LITERALLY NOBODY COMPLAINS?

That's why I don't mind at all when I read NTR, the protagonists are so... Ugh But that doesn't mean I like it when the villain gets what he wants, unfortunately NTR's writers are too masochistic and never finish their stories.